Friday, September 19, 2008

Momentum on the side of Pakatan Rakyat

John Lee is a second-year student of economics at Dartmouth College in the United States. He has been thinking aloud since 2005 at

Momentum on the side of Pakatan Rakyat

SEPT 19 — September 16 has come and gone, with no change of government yet. The temptation to be disappointed in Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim if you're a Pakatan Rakyat fan, or to denounce Anwar, if you cheer Barisan Nasional, is undoubtedly there.

But once you put Anwar's promise of Sept 16 out of the picture, you can really appreciate the fact that the momentum and trends are on the side of Pakatan, not Barisan, and Anwar Ibrahim, not Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi.

Why set aside the Sept 16 prediction? Because we have let ourselves get carried away with the hype. Many were expecting something huge on the 16th, and when it did not materialise, they were disappointed — or alternately buoyed, depending on their political views. But from an objective standpoint, Pakatan stands on the cusp of taking power, and Barisan is almost certainly just biding its time left in power.

The elections of 2004 and 2008 were clear mandates for reform. Nobody disputes this. This is about the only real, concrete and indisputable truth left in Malaysian politics. In 2004, voters gave Abdullah a resounding mandate to clean up the government and civil service and restore our institutions. In 2008, after Abdullah's abysmal failure, they swung their support to the Anwar-led Pakatan, which promised not only the same things as Abdullah had, but even more.

Even now, Abdullah's supporters support him because they believe he is the best way to reform the country; his opponents support his challengers because they believe Abdullah is incapable of reform. The key issue is inescapably cleaning things up and rehabilitating our ruined institutions.

But on this score, Abdullah and his Barisan government have only gone from failure to failure after a very brief attempt at reform post-March 8. Immediately after the election, Abdullah made a raft of announcements promising key changes to the structure of the judiciary, the Constitution, the Anti-Corruption Agency — the list goes on and on. He appointed key reform-minded men to the Cabinet, especially people like Datuk Zaid Ibrahim and Datuk Shahrir Abdul Samad. But after this brief respite from corruption and decadence, Abdullah has increasingly made it clear that reform comes second to the political priorities of his person and his party.

The stark reality was only hinted at when the numerous reforms Zaid and Abdullah proposed were shot down privately by the Cabinet, but the final blows have only come, ironically, in the days leading up to Sept 16. When Abdullah censored a political website for the first time in Malaysian history, when Abdullah allowed racist remarks by leaders of his own party to go practically unpunished in spite of immense public outcry, when his government made mass arrests of writers and elected representatives under draconian laws for the first time in his term as premier, it became clear that the thin veneer of reform has completely been peeled back.

Zaid's resignation was the final nail in the coffin for these rehashed reforms. Even though Abdullah clearly means well, he is not delivering the reforms Malaysians want; he is, if anything, returning us to the days of Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad, where people were actively terrorised by their own government and the rule of law subservient to the prime minister's convenience.

Yet at the same time, Barisan is more divided than ever: while Umno power struggles were nothing new during Dr Mahathir's tenure, other component parties actively questioning the government's and Umno's decisions would never be allowed by a Mahathir administration. This is not a sign of opening up, however, but a clear indicator that most Barisan component parties, as well as Umno leaders from East Malaysia, recognise that the people of Malaysia are fed up with Abdullah's inability to deliver the change he promised, and his government's complete failure to address the needs of the economy, society and the bedrock institutions of our country.

The SAPP's decision to quit Barisan, announced earlier this week, is in all probability the first of many such to come; the position of most Barisan component parties is simply untenable as long as Umno remains recalcitrant.

Nevertheless, it is harder to say what Pakatan's position actually is. The nature of the game they have been playing is such that you cannot tell how strong they are till events come to a crescendo and force them to show their hand. Intuitively, it seems that Pakatan does not have the MPs it needs to form a new government.

However, I think it is equally likely that they are doing two things, the first being holding out for broader support from MPs. Forming a government with a shaky majority will hardly cultivate the stability Pakatan needs to carry out its planned reforms, even more so if this majority is built on the basis of non-Malay support. I am almost certain that Pakatan can count on the backing of many non-Malay MPs, but it must secure the support of Malay representatives to rightly say it is a government for all.

The second conundrum is ensuring a stable transition period; although it is a convenient excuse that they must obtain the prime minister's promise of stability before going ahead, it is also a fact that Pakatan needs in some sense the blessing of the prime minister to take power.

After all, Abdullah could easily detain all the Pakatan MPs, and any MPs who cross over as well, as threats to national security. He could erect roadblocks around Parliament and prevent a no-confidence vote against his government. He could even declare martial law, if he really wanted to, since we are still in a state of emergency (the emergency of May 13 has never been revoked).

Pakatan at the least needs the police and armed forces to agree to its forming the new government before it can proceed, and that is what a Pakatan legislator told me they were working on when I met him about three weeks ago.

People are now blaming Anwar and Pakatan for unnecessary politicking and destabilising the current government, when he does not appear to have the MPs he needs; the fact is, however, if he could never get the MPs he needs, he would not be destabilising the government in the first place. That the government would send 50 backbenchers away on a ridiculous "learning trip" to Taiwan just to preclude any announcement on Sept 16 is but one sign of growing desperation on Barisan's part. If they have no reason to fear Anwar and Pakatan, why do they fear Anwar and Pakatan?

It is insane for Anwar to continue to declare that he has the numbers if he has no reason to think so. At any point he could back down and backpedal — he might lose some credibility, but a week in politics is a long time, and as long as he did not run away with his tail between his legs, as long as he promised an eventual change, people would forgive him after a while.

If anything, they might be more excited if Anwar promised to devote his time to moving the five Pakatan-governed states ahead, and forming a shadow Cabinet at the federal level. Anwar and Pakatan have so much more to lose if the year ends with them still making clearly false promises, while Barisan closes ranks and refutes their claims. I do not think Anwar would simply and thoughtlessly blare the Sept 16 promise from the rooftops unless he had a reason to believe that he would have the opportunity he needs to seize power some time this month, or not long after; that Barisan is running scared simply confirms this.

Momentum is on the side of Pakatan: the Abdullah-led Barisan government is incapable of delivering the reforms and changes the Malaysian people want, and everyone knows it. And it is abundantly clear that any of Abdullah's successors from within Umno will be unable or unwilling to make good on these reforms either, if the response to the raft of reforms Abdullah initially floated is anything to go by.

As things stand Malaysia is in a ridiculous position: only in Malaysia can ministers (Maximus Ongkili), leaders of the opposition (Lim Kit Siang, Anwar) and elected representatives say they have been arrested as terrorists threatening national security under the Internal Security Act. Investors and the people at large are losing confidence, not because of Anwar, but because Abdullah is only abusing our corroded institutions even further to maintain his grip on power.

It is ridiculous to blame Anwar and Pakatan alone for causing all this confounded politicking and this instability; they are a cause of it, but far from the single cause. The fact is, Barisan is running scared, not just from Pakatan, but from the grassroots support Pakatan has: it has so far only detained one Pakatan politician, but several bloggers. The government terrorising its own people is hardly confidence-inspiring. The ruling party's clear rejection of institutional reforms and just treatment for all peoples of Malaysia are far greater blows to public confidence and stability than the supposedly empty threats of a politician.

The resignation of the only minister committed to fixing the country's legal system, the foundation for all commercial and political activity, is always going to be more threatening to confidence and faith in the government than the allegedly groundless claims of an opposition leader. The fact is, Barisan is entirely to blame for the position it is in: Barisan is in all likelihood days or weeks away from losing power, and all because it has irresponsibly abused the power we, the Malaysian people, have vested in it.

If I ever had any real doubts that Pakatan should form the next government soon, Barisan has resoundingly erased them with its actions over the past few months. Public sentiment is overwhelmingly against Barisan, and they know it. We all know it; the elections told us what the people want, and we all know that Barisan is incapable of giving us what we need. For the sake of our country, I look forward to a new government under Pakatan. A Pakatan government may not guarantee a bright future for our country, but remaining under Barisan rule can only guarantee a future of travail, terror and tyranny.

John Lee thinks crossovers might be unethical, but can hardly see the ethicality in supporting a government which terrorises its own people. He writes at

Bookmark Email This
Comments (10)
Show/Hide comments
written by james, September 19, 2008

crossover is not "might be unethical" its grossly and dammingly unethical
-7 ...
written by Terry, September 19, 2008

Grossly and damning unethical as sending innocents to lockup on ISA?
Grossly and damning unethical as making a mockery of our democracy by blurring the lines of segregation between executive, judiciary and legislation?
Grossly and damning unethical as letting our police / AG and ACA acting on their behalf rather than for the people?
Grossly and damning unethical as race discrimination?
Grossly and damning unethical as announcing no increase in fuel price but the next day increase fuel price?
+6 Unethical in politics?
written by Joeawk, September 19, 2008

By the way, what is so unethical about MPs crossing over, especially in the context of Malaysian politics. Our general elections had hardly ever been fair and our MPs' vocabulary is limited to only yes and no in pariament.

Look at the SAPP MPs and assemblymen, they are quiting their party because the SAPP leaves the BN resulting in them losing their position. Do you think they disagree with their leadership because of principles or because of the govt position they hold?

I am not surprised with their conduct because they typifies most of humanity today, people who care more for themseves than the people who elected them.

We cannot be taking abouting the ethics of MPs crossing over without looking and commenting on other factors affecting politics. Anypne agrees with the arrest of the sinchew reporter nder the ISA? Anyone agrees with the barua from bkt bendera still walking the street when he should have been thrown into the dungeon.

When dealing with regimes as manipulative and corrupt and bankrupt as UMNO, one cannot be talking about ethics. One should pray and hope that with one stroke, the earth will open up and swallow UMNO and all the crooks within.
+6 ...
written by Azmi, September 19, 2008

My friends, two wrongs can never make a right. Yes, the usage of ISA is unethical and yes the government is weak and at times grossly incompetent. Nevertheless a change of government without mandate of the people and on the basis of defection of MPs is highly unethical, there is just no two ways of looking at it. Toppling a corrupt government by corrupt means (dont tell me with a straight face that anwar is enticing his "firmly commited" MPs by charisma alone...come on now) is just as bad if not worst. Whose to say that the same defecting MPs wont rejoin BN every time they feel like it?....we will be having a new government every other week....come now people dont let anger cloud your judgment, this is a democracy let elections decide our fate as a country.

-3 Lesser of two evils
written by Hwa Shi-Hsia, September 19, 2008

Getting MPs to switch parties shortly after an election IS unethical undemocratic because you've taken away the constituents' choice of which party they wanted to support. In this case, however, it is by far the lesser of two evils.

Don't say that just because the government we are struggling against is unethical, it's OK for us to be unethical too. There's a movie called "The Wind that Shakes the Barley" about 2 brothers who join the IRA. The younger brother wants justice and fairness for the poor, the older brother just wants the British out of Ireland no matter what. In the end the older one, as an IRA leader ends up supporting various injustices and has to execute his brother.

We have to keep justice and freedom in sight and not just be Anwar's fan club. I support his taking over the government because things are so bad, I just wish there was a better way.
+0 ...
written by Ordinary Malaysian, September 19, 2008

End this once and for all. Call for fresh elections.
+1 Najib's call
written by Concerned Mal, September 19, 2008

Let's face it Abdullah is on his way out and it looks likely that Najib will be in his seat sooner than expected. The one thing Najib can do to seek endorsement of his position as the PM is to either call an emergency parliamentary meeting to get the votes of the MPs (for or against BN's leadership) or a snap election for the Rakyat to decide if BN is STILL the order of the day. This will win him back his (and BN's) credibility and settle the political turmoil of whether its BN or PR - ONCE AND FOR ALL - till the next general elections.
+2 light at the of the tunnel is the powerfull headlight of bullet train heading towords BN TO CRUSHED TO PIECES
written by taxidriver, September 19, 2008

on track is on track the date for anwar to call the shot, he did NOTsay he will become the P.M.He did not at anytime said, its is the main strean media's mercenary writters who made out to tarnch DSAI name.coming this far is an achievement from ashes to make B.N, to their knees said the NST EDITORIAL.
it is impossible to fight the B.N ELECTION MECHINARY THE BATTLE CRY of those says he proofed it can be done the psychogical barrier the malaysians must thank for that, the oroofed the this country shying away from raciai divide rule of B.N GOMEN AT PERMATANG PUAH by election.he did all this with alot of barriers along the fear the change will came like the BULLET TRAIN. FOR MORE INFORMATION

written by rashid hussein, September 19, 2008

+2 what relief they see the light at the end of the tunnel
written by taxidriver, September 19, 2008

nothing change come sept16 on track ,yes indeed the light at the end the tunnel turn out to be the headlight of the bullet charging at the BN AT TOP SPEED NOW U TELL ME HOW LONG THEY CAN LAST
PLEASE LOG INTO for more stories

About This Site
Home >> About This Site

This is me.

I am John Lee Ming Keong, an 18-year-old student and writer from a suburb of the Klang Valley in Selangor, Malaysia. I am presently studying for my bachelor's degree at Dartmouth College in the United States. I started Infernal Ramblings in 2005 to present a Malaysian perspective on politics, society and economics — to help people understand my country, and just as importantly, the world in which my country exists.

What this means is that the main focus of this site is issues of current interest to Malaysians. However, because no country is a metaphorical island, I will also frequently write on topics of concern to people around the world, and from other countries. I am a policy wonk, so those interested in public policy will often find things that catch their fancy. If you have any questions or just would like to chat, you are more than welcome to contact me.

All software code © John Lee Ming Keong 2005 – Armageddon. The copyright to anything else on this website belongs to their respective author(s) or creator(s) unless otherwise stated. All trademarks are property of their respective owners. See also credits, legal disclaimer and our privacy policy.

Page dumped by server in 0.0324 seconds

John Lee is a second-year student of economics at Dartmouth College in the United States. He has been thinking aloud since 2005 at

No comments: